Loading...
Loading...
Three steps to catch review comments earlier — before you submit.
Upload architectural PDFs. BuildCompass ingests the set, identifies relevant sheets, and pulls the labeled information reviewers look for.
We evaluate rules using what's explicitly documented in the drawings. Results are grouped as Likely Compliant, Issues to Review, or Needs Clarification when details aren't shown.
Share results internally, address gaps, and re-run checks in minutes—so you submit with fewer surprises and fewer resubmittals.
Sample Output (Illustrative) — Results vary based on drawing completeness.
Project
Medical Office Tenant Improvement
Code Basis
IBC 2021 + ADA
Exit signs are specified with internal illumination meeting the 5 foot-candle minimum requirement. Emergency power backup is noted on the electrical schedule.
Why flagged: Evidence found on electrical plans confirms illuminated exit signs with battery backup at all required egress points.
Door hardware is specified at 42" AFF, within the compliant range of 34" to 48" above finished floor per ADA requirements.
Why flagged: Door schedule explicitly states lever hardware mounting height within accessible range.
Building is fully sprinklered per NFPA 13 with coverage throughout tenant space including the new exam rooms and waiting area.
Why flagged: Fire protection plan shows complete sprinkler coverage with head spacing within NFPA 13 requirements.
Main corridor width appears to be 44" clear based on dimension callout, but occupant load calculation suggests minimum 48" may be required for this occupancy.
Why flagged: Corridor width dimension found, but calculated egress width requirement based on occupant load may exceed what is shown.
Corridor construction type is not explicitly called out. B occupancy corridors serving more than 30 occupants require 1-hour fire-resistance rating.
Why flagged: No fire-resistance rating found for corridor walls. Building is non-sprinklered per code path, which triggers 1-hour corridor requirement.
Reception counter transaction surface appears to be at 42" AFF based on millwork detail. ADA maximum for forward reach is 48", but accessible counter portion should be at 36" max.
Why flagged: Accessible transaction counter height not clearly identified. Standard counter height may exceed accessible requirements.
Unable to verify 60" turning radius in accessible restroom. Fixture layout shown but overall room dimensions are not dimensioned on this sheet.
Why flagged: Clear floor space verification requires geometry measurement that cannot be determined from available drawing information.
Stair section shows general configuration but individual riser heights are not dimensioned. IBC limits risers to 7" maximum.
Why flagged: Riser dimension not found on stair detail. Verify riser heights comply with 4" min, 7" max requirement.
This sample demonstrates review output structure. Actual results depend on drawing content and quality.
Standard AI often hallucinates small measurements because it views entire pages as a single low-resolution image. BuildCompass takes a fundamentally different approach.
Every large-scale blueprint is precision-dissected into 9 high-resolution overlapping tiles for granular analysis.
Analyzing drawings at 9× the standard resolution ensures every 1/8" dimension and fractional note is captured with enhanced accuracy.
While standard AI treats a 24×36 sheet like a thumbnail, we analyze it like a forensic engineer—with precision-engineered rigor.
Real-time forensic scanning visualization
Standard on all Professional plans to ensure Building Code compliance at scale.
Practical outcomes for architecture teams preparing permit submissions.
Surface likely issues and missing information before plans are submitted — not weeks later during city review.
Give project leads and reviewers a shared view of findings so issues are addressed once, not passed around piecemeal.
BuildCompass flags uncertainty explicitly, helping teams focus on documentation gaps instead of assumptions.
Enter the review process knowing what's documented, what's missing, and what needs follow-up — before the city tells you.
BuildCompass doesn't replace professional judgment — it helps teams apply it earlier.